Free Subscription to Health Content Weekly Perspective
Categories
- Advertising
- Clinical tools
- Clinical Trials
- CMS, HHS
- Companies
- Conferences
- Consumer Health
- Databases
- DrugInfo
- EHRs
- Google Health
- Health2.0
- Healthcare Publishing
- HealthIT
- HIE
- Image search
- Infocommerce
- InfoCommerce Group
- IPO
- Licensing
- Medical Research
- Medical Search
- Medical Tourism
- Microsoft HealthVault
- multimedia
- Payers
- Personalized Medicine
- Pharma
- Physician directories
- Physicians
- Point-of-care Applications
- Social networking
- Uncategorized
Archives
Blogroll
Health Content: Going for the Gold, Not Glitz
- Posted March 13th 2008
- by Janice
Healthline, which maintains its own consumer healthcare portal site while also licensing technology and content to other healthcare sites, has announced an agreement with Aetna to supply Healthline’s search and related tools to Aetna’s new SmartSource healthcare search engine.
This deal serves as a reminder that the open Web is not the only place where healthcare consumers connect with online medical information. While much attention is being lavished on the glitzy consumer health portals, few have noted that most of them are too broadly focused and without differentiation. Everything from healthy lifestyle information, disease-specific information, to drug data, calorie counters, and social networking discussion groups are all thrown together on one site. Sites such as Revolution Health, WebMD, iVillage Your Total Health, About.com/Health are all beginning to look alike.
While the overabundance of content is becoming increasingly hard to navigate, the reason behind it is clear – ad dollars. All of these health care portals are following the money, and they need to keep building inventory to attract ever more advertisers. While the potential advertising pot is in the billions of dollars, it is unclear who, among the current crop of consumer healthcare sites, will attract sufficient traffic and ad dollars to be the long term winners in this very competitive space.
What does this mean for publishers of medical information and healthcare-related content. It means that expected revenue from ad-share deals with consumer healthcare portals on the open Web remains unpredictable, and wise publishers should also seek deals with alternative distribution channels like employee benefits sites that are sponsored by the healthcare payers: employers and health insurers. In the Healthline deal, the Aetna Navigator site is on the Internet with access by password. In other cases, employers host Employee Assistance Programs (EAP) on intranets and typically include information about all benefits programs. But regardless of the implementation, these sites deliver a sizeable audience that is craving content that is more tailored to their needs, and health content publishers would be wise to pursue these less obvious but still rich channels.
2 Responses to “Health Content: Going for the Gold, Not Glitz”
Leave a Reply
Recent Posts
- AARP Launches Health Tools on Its Website
- Surviving the Shakeout in Consumer Health Sites
- Early Registration Ends Aug 31 for Health Content08
Register Now

About InfoCommerce Group
March 13th, 2008 at 8:41 am
Great post, and I agree with your recommendation to seek alternative channels.
Another approach is to provide truly differentiated content - go deep in a vertical health channel and provide the best information possible on that health area. Spine-health.com does this for pain. Other sites do this well in other verticals, such as Healthyplace.com for depression.
March 13th, 2008 at 9:32 am
Stephanie,
I agree that specialized sites that offer deep content on specific conditions often provide better solutions for users interested in the specific health area. But, can the specialized sites survive without sponsorship and additional revenue sources beyond standard online ads? (E.g., content fees of some kind.)