Free Subscription to Health Content Weekly Perspective
Categories
- Advertising
- Clinical tools
- Clinical Trials
- CMS, HHS
- Companies
- Conferences
- Consumer Health
- Databases
- DrugInfo
- EHRs
- Google Health
- Health2.0
- Healthcare Publishing
- HealthIT
- HIE
- Image search
- Infocommerce
- InfoCommerce Group
- IPO
- Licensing
- Medical Research
- Medical Search
- Medical Tourism
- Microsoft HealthVault
- multimedia
- Payers
- Personalized Medicine
- Pharma
- Physician directories
- Physicians
- Point-of-care Applications
- Social networking
- Uncategorized
Archives
Blogroll
Healthcare 3R’s Bring Pain and Gain
- Posted May 23rd 2008
- by Janice
Arguably the most powerful and actionable of all consumer health information, ratings, rankings ad recommendations (the 3R’s), present both opportunities and minefields, as the Massachusetts Group Insurance Commission (GIC) found out this week when a lawsuit was filed against them by the Massachusetts Medical Society (MMS).
GIC ranks physicians using cost and quality measures, and its rankings are used for cost containment; patients have to pay higher copayments for doctors who rank in the lower tiers. MMS, which has more than 20,000 physicians and student members, alleges that GIC’s system, called Clinical Performance Improvement Initiative (CPI), uses “inaccurate, unreliable and invalid tools and data”. In particular, the complaint cites miscoding of procedures and inaccurate assignment of patients to physicians who were not responsible for their care.
A different ratings approach is practiced by the department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS). Its CAHPS program centers its rankings on patient satisfaction measures. HHS was also in the news this week with a near-full-page ad in local papers in all 50 states promoting the use of the Hospital Compare site (http://www.hospitalcompare.hhs.gov/). As reported by AP, “the ads reflect an emphasis by the Bush administration to increase transparency in the health care system. Officials say greater public disclosure of costs and quality will drive providers to improve on both fronts.”
Currently, hospitals are penalized with a reduction in their reimbursement rates from CMS if they do not participate in the CAHPS program. It is expected that HHS will continue down the path of pay-for-performance (P4P) as the CAHPS program develops.
The 3R’s are shaping up to be a lively and controversial business, and Health Content Advisors and our parent company, InfoCommerce Group, will continue to monitor closely those information products that offer ratings, rankings, and recommendations, and you can look for them to continue to play a prominent role in this year’s Health Content08 conference.
Recent Posts
- AARP Launches Health Tools on Its Website
- Surviving the Shakeout in Consumer Health Sites
- Early Registration Ends Aug 31 for Health Content08
Register Now

About InfoCommerce Group
Leave a Reply